Zeigler, Part XIII
You are currently browsing comments. If you would like to return to the full story, you can read the full entry here: “Zeigler, Part XIII”.
Categories: Forensics, Miscarriages of Justice, Zeigler
Tags: Actual Innocence, Autopsy, Ballistics, Capital Punishment, Crime Scene, Cruelty, Death Row, DNA, DNA Database, Evidence, Expert Testimony, Florida, Forensics, Gun Fire, Identification, Investigations Division, Miscarriage of Justice, Police, Prisons, Prosecutorial Misconduct, Victim, William Thomas Zeigler, Wrongful Convictions
Great interpretation, especially Eunice’s death scene which has been a major puzzle.
Thank you very much, ma’am.
The state of Florida contended at trial that Eunice was shot by surprise. The only person who could have come close enough to her to do this was of course, her husband, according to the prosecution. If that theory were true than Eunice would have been shot from an even closer distance. As her husband, Zeigler could easily have made body contact.
The state sent Zeigler’s shoes to the FBI labs to determine whether he made those footprints that you can clearly see on the pictures. The results: negative!
I am convinced that the crime scene was never correctly interpreted and hope that somehow we can get a third-party to re-examine ALL the evidence.
Thank you for reading about this case and please check back regularly. There is a lot of information that still needs to be published, V